• Matthew 22:37-39
  • John 15:12-13
  • Psalm 69:35
  • Isaiah 1:18
  • John 15:12-13
  • Luke 11:41
  • Proverbs 17:22
  • 1 Thessalonians 5:17
  • Ezekiel 18:25-28
  • 1 Corinthian 13:4-7
  • Luke 11:41
  • Proverbs 17:22
  • 1 Thessalonians 5:17
  • Ezekiel 18:25-28
  • Ezekiel 18:25-28
  • 1 Corinthian 13:4-7

Wednesday, August 24, 2016

Creationism vs. Big Bang



CREATIONIST

Several scientists presuppose that in due course the universe stop inflating and start to subside inward. Then it will again explode and repeat its oscillating type of uninterrupted motion. This thought is an attempt to avoid an origin and destiny for the universe. For oscillation to happen, however, the universe must have a certain density or distribution of mass. So far, the dimensions of the mass density are 100 times smaller than expected. In fact, there are indications that the universe is accelerating outward instead of decelerating. The universe does not emerge to be oscillating. The significant mass or “dark matter” is “missing.”

There is no mysterious infinitely small singularity from which the entire universe burst forth, no completely untraceable exotic ‘Dark Matter’ governing the universe, and no mysterious law-violating ‘Dark Energy’ accelerating the universe apart. In their place is a possibly stationary universe of likely infinite size and age, within which stars of regular matter go through perpetual births and deaths, with gravity-driven dynamics in ordinary three-dimensional space, (which has been erroneously proved) by the Nobel Prize evolutionistsincluding the time, and from entirely regular matter to apparently mostly imperceptible matter filling the   cosmos, from a static universe to one coasting apart, and up to accelerating expansion.)

It was long thought that the gravity of matter in the universe would slow its expansion, or even cause it to contract.

EVOLUTIONIST

Edwin Hubble’s findings in 1900s divulged that the Universe was inflating than static.

Astronomer Edwin Hubble made a world-shattering breakthrough about the universe in the 1920s using a newly constructed telescope at the Mount Wilson Observatory in Los Angeles, Hubble observed that the universe is not stationary, but rather is inflating. 

In the 1960s and 1970s, astronomers started mulling over that there might be more mass in the universe than what is perceptible. Vera Rubin, an astronomer at the Carnegie Institution of Washington, examined the speeds of stars at diverse sites in galaxies. 

In 1998, the prolific space telescope named after the famous astronomer, the Hubble Space Telescope, studied very far-flung supernovas and disclosed that, a long time ago, the universe was inflating more gradually than it is today. 

David Spergel, a theoretical astrophysicist at Princeton University in Princeton divulged that as it expanded, it turned cooler and less dense.

Light chemical elements were formed within the first three minutes of the universe's formation. As the universe inflated, temperatures cooled and protons and neutrons smashed together which formed into deuterium, which is an isotope of hydrogen. More of this deuterium merged to form helium.




Scripture
Evolutionist


All elements made together
Elements beyond hydrogen and helium formed after millions of years

Earth formed before stars
Earth formed long after the stars

Plants formed before the sun
Plants evolved after the sun

Birds created before reptiles,   mammals
Birds evolved from reptiles

Sun formed on the 4th day after the Earth
Sun formed before the Earth

Sun, moon, and stars formed   together
Sun formed from older stars
  


CREATIONIST


Professor Laura Mersini-Houghton, scientist from University of North Carolina unveils of a mathematical proof that black holes as illustrated in the succeeding page  can't exist stating that it is impossible for stars to collapse and form a singularity. Previously, scientists thought stars larger than the sun collapsed under their own gravity and formed black holes as they died.

The mass concentration theory would remain forever bound as a universal black hole which expansion is prevented by gravity.

A black hole is at the center of at least every nearby galaxy. Black holes are so enormous that nothing can escape their gravity - even light. Astronomers divulge that black holes must have existed very soon after the universe started, the big bang theory exclaims that all matter was spread out uniformly after 300,000 years, before stars developed. This uniformity would prevent gravity from forming galaxies and black holes even over the alleged age of the universe. Nevertheless, stars and black holes could easily have developed or existed soon after the creation of matter and the universe, when the universe was much smaller and the heavens had not yet been stretched out. Had this stretching not happened, all the matter in the universe would have collapsed into a black hole. Life would not exist.

The dimensions of black holes at the center of galaxies and the dimensions of the central bulges of galaxies are positively associated with the sizes of galaxies. The standard explanation for galaxy formation says that this should not be. However, if the matter that developed galaxies and black holes was once inside exceedingly compact space, the largest galaxies should have the largest black holes and central bulges.

Black holes are the corpses of giant stars and if such a star runs out of fuel, its core subsides inward. Gravity pulls everything into a progressively violent hold. Temperatures arrive at 100 billion degrees. Atoms are shattered. Electrons are minced. Those pieces are further creased.

Big bang theory requires the equal production of matter and antimatter.  However, only small traces of antimatter - positrons and antiprotons, for example are discovered in space.

Anything atomically heavier than hydrogen and helium is considered to be a metal, including, for example, oxygen. It should be noted that Astronomers use the term metal differently as it is used in chemistry. Therefore, the first stars of the universe could have been made only from hydrogen and helium, and these stars are known as Population III stars.


All stars perceived throughout the universe contain metals, such as Population I stars, which are metal-rich, and Population II stars that are metal-poor. Population I stars which holds approximately 2-3% metals are found in the spiral arms or in the disks of galaxies. Population II stars which holds only 0.1% metal content in their light spectra, are observed around a galaxy halo, in globular clusters, and in the central bulge of a galaxy.

Furthermore, when we gaze across the universe, looking back in time close to when the Big Bang allegedly happened, the light which can be seen exhibits metal spectra.

Vera Rubin, American astronomer found no disparity in the speeds of stars farther out. She discovered that all stars in a galaxy seem to surround the center at approximately the same speed.


EVOLUTIONIST


Dark energy is contemplated to be the bizarre force that is pulling the cosmos away at ever-amplifying speeds, but it remains invisible and mysterious. The existence of this indefinable energy, which is thought to make up 73 percent of the universe, is one of the most excitably disputed issues in cosmology.

Basic Newtonian physics implies that stars on the borders of a galaxy would orbit more gradually than stars at the center. 

This strange and undetectable mass became identified as dark matter, which is incidental because of the gravitational pull it wields on regular matter. This could be formed by unusual particles that do not interact with light or regular matter that makes it to be hardly detected. 

There is a notion that dark matter makes up 23 percent of the universe. In comparison, only 4 percent of the universe is composed of regular matter, which includes stars, planets and people.

The physics of the Big Bang avers that the only elements that the Big Bang could have generated are hydrogen, helium, and probably a trace of lithium, but no other metals.


CREATIONIST

On March 17, 2014, astronomers from the California Institute of Technology, the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Stanford University, and the University of Minnesota made known their findings of signature patterns of polarized light in the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), attributed to gravitational waves in the early universe. However, astronomers conveyed reduced confidence in these findings on 19 June 2014, and reported a further reduction in confidence on September 19, 2014.

EVOLUTIONIST
The Big Bang was not literally an explosion (as others claimed) but the appearance of space everywhere in the universe. Accordingly, the universe was born as a very hot, very dense, single point in space.

Cosmologists are irresolute what occurred before this event, but with sophisticated space missions, ground-based telescopes and complicated calculations, scientists have been laboring to come up with a comprehensible image of the early universe development. Part of these origins from observations of the cosmic microwave background which contains the afterglow of light and radiation as residual of the Big Bang. This historical object of the Big Bang passes through the universe and is perceptible through microwave detectors, which allows scientists to assemble evidences of the early universe. 

   
CREATIONIST

The big bang theory forecasts that the universe’s inflation must be decelerating, just as a ball tossed upward must reduce its velocity as it moves away from the Earth. For decades, cosmologists attempted to gauge this deceleration. The shocking result has been rechecked in many ways. The universe’s expansion is not decelerating but accelerating

Estimates of the universe’s actual mass always fell far short of that minimum mass amount. This “missing mass” is often called dark matter, because no one could see it or even detect it.

EVOLUTIONIST

For decades, big bang theorists assert that the quantity of mass in a swiftly inflating universe must be enough to prevent all matter from flying apart; otherwise, matter could not merge to form stars and galaxies.

Missing Mass 
   
CREATIONIST

Visualize seeing several rocks in outer space, moving drastically away from Earth. If the rocks were simultaneously exploded away from Earth, their masses, changing velocities, and distances from Earth would have a very precise mathematical relationship with each other. When a similar relationship is checked for billions of perceptible galaxies, an evident conclusion is that these galaxies did not explode from a common point in a gigantic “big bang.”  It is even more apparent that if such a blast happened, it must have been much, much less than billions of years ago.

The assumption that the universe is filled with at least ten times as much as   can be seen  is sustained even though three decades of searching for this “missing mass” but have turned up nothing other than the findings that it does not exist.
EVOLUTIONIST

Evolutionists try to patch up this issue in two ways by an assumption that the universe is filled with at least ten times as much matter as can be seen. 

The second assumption was that, the rocks (or, in the real problem, all particles in the universe) were for a short time, almost magically, accelerated away from a location. This process, called inflation, supposedly reached speeds billions of trillions of times quicker than lights’ velocity. In instant later, and for no obvious reason, inflation discontinued. All this occurred by an unknown, untestable phenomenon - not by a blast. Then this matter turned to be dominated by gravity after it reached just the right speed to give the universe an apparent age (based on one set of assumptions) of about 13.7 billion years. 


Pages 1 2 3 4

No comments:

DutyFreeAffiliates